2009-12-10

The Most Popular SFW Failblog Pics of the Decade

The Kool Aid pitcher breaking through the wall is just awesome. (see below) [via nealrodriguez]

13

Homework Fail

Homework Fail

12

Google Suggest Fail

Google Suggest Fail

11

School Bus Fail

School Bus Fail

10

Graffiti Win

Graffiti Win

9

Attempted Murder Fail

Attempted Murder Fail

8

Serious Text Fail

Serious Text Fail

7

Audi Billboard Fail

Audi Billboard Fail

6

Denial Fail

Denial Fail

5

Object Group Fail

Object Group Fail

4

Bill Payment Win

Bill Payment Win

3

Bambi Fail

Bambi Fail

2

Congratulations Fail

Congratulations Fail

1

Sneaky Restaurant Fail

Sneaky Restaurant Fail

NSFW Fails (stop scrolling if you’re under 18… I’m watchin!)

3

Gummy Fail, Dirty Mind Win

Gummy Fail, Dirty Mind Win

Did you like this post? Leave your comments below!
Found this Post interesting? Receive new posts via RSS (What is RSS?) or Subscribe to CR by Email

[+/-] EXPAND TO READ FULL POST...


15 Creepiest Subversive Ads in History

Cool ads push the boundaries of what is acceptable, helping us to think in new and exciting ways. But some just cross the line into downright creepiness…
[via businesspundit]

15. Toyota Prius – Killer

Ads - prius

Image via alexisgentry

This spectacularly creepy advert from Toyota depicts a man dumping a body into a lake, with the line ‘Well at least he drives a Prius’. Suggesting that driving a Toyota can forgive all your sins is just downright too far – let’s just hope this didn’t give anyone any ideas…

14. NSPCC – Anti-Child Abuse

ads - child abuse 2Image via trendhunter

This billboard is the visual equivalent of the following conversation: ‘Where’s Archie mommy?’ ‘He’s dead. I killed him with a hatchet.’ Apart from the fact the scarily realistic blood is grotesque, surely this billboard would be even more creepy for kids on a day out in the back of the car? Mommy and Daddy have a surprise for you when we get home… and it’s not nice.

13. JBS Underwear – Women Behaving Badly


These ads for JBS underwear feature shots of semi-naked women doing things in stereotypically male fashion, such as having beer with breakfast, or reading a mag on the toilet. Not only does this campaign, which bears the tagline ‘Men don’t want to look at men naked’, border on softcore porn, but it hits a little too close to home for many mens’ tastes – hot girls having beer for breakfast? Nice. But burping on the toilet…

12. Use Condoms


This advert seems amusing enough but manages to leave a distinctly creepy taste in the mouth by implicitly begging the question, how many of us were noisy, messy, bratty mistakes?

11. IGN Surrogates – Sexy Robots

ads - ign surrogatesImage via flicks

These posters have been all over NYC and use sexually provocative poses with the jarring addition of sections of exposed mechanical insides. Although everyone loves a saucy fembot, the juxtaposition between evil mechanical robot and sensual feminine flesh makes for uncomfortable viewing.

10. Tampax – Red

ads - tampax red

Image via adsoftheworld

Adverts for women’s hygiene products always have massive potential to creep people out. The sheer volume of red on display here becomes nauseating as we gradually understand what this advert is getting at – anything that so forcefully and boldly draws attention to what really goes on down there really is just creepy (at least, for men).

9. Virgin Trains – Animal Sex Party


This advert is meant to showcase the environmental perks of Virgin Trains in the UK, an idea that is fairly amusing – people dressing up as furry animals and pretending to ‘do it’ so often is – it’s the over the top execution that becomes slightly disturbing. Rabbits doing it one-leg-up against a tree sets alarm bells ringing, but for us the creepy line is crossed when a flock of sheep tackle a bumble bee before gang-raping the poor thing. If that isn’t creepy, we don’t know what is.

8. Dolce & Gabbana – Rose Tinted Glasses

Although this raunchy commercial sets pulses racing, when the glasses are taken off and the hot girl spanking herself is revealed to be a rotund cleaning woman, we can’t help but feel a little freaked out. What’s more, it draws attention to the subversive nature of all advertising: presenting things through rose tinted glasses, in their best light – as such it provides a creepy reminder of the way advertising manipulates our lives on a daily basis.

6. Comfeze – Canadian Men In Diapers


This at first seems like a crappy ad for diapers, and features a load of men running around in diapers with the line ‘now your big guy doesn’t have to worry about a thing’. But by the end of the commercial we realize that the diapers are needed because the men can’t help but wet themselves whilst watching horror channel, Scream TV. The combination of weird kiddy music and men frolicking around in diapers before weeing themselves, is more than a little bit creepy.

5. Pakistani Airlines 1979 – Twin Towers

pakistan-airlines-ad

Image in public domain, via randomdribble

This isn’t strictly speaking an example of ’subversive advertising’, but we felt merited a place in the list. The ad is real and meant to show the glory and cosmopolitan nature of PIA – Pakistani Airlines – but the shadow of a plane looming large on the twin towers comes off as extremely creepy in retrospect, especially given the irony that it is an ad for a Muslim country’s airlines.

4. Hansaplast Condoms – My Mom Said I Could


The weird combination of slighty-cute, slightly-mischevious boy who gets up to no good and justifies himself with the phrase, ‘my mom said I could’, and the twist at the end where we realize all mom says every day is ‘Oui!’ Oui!’ as she enjoys herself in the bedroom, or worse, services another client…. that’s just creepy.

3.Deutsch Magazine – Dogs on Heat

deutschdog2

Image via shockvertsiements

Not much explanation needed here. This ad does not hold back on the bestiality and really does cross the line into downright scariness. We sincerely hope there aren’t people out there doing this – and in any case what impression does Deutsch magazine hope to give with this ad?

2.French Anti-Aids Campaign

french_AIDS_ADS

Image via shockvertsiements

These graphic and disturbing ads are part of a real life AIDS campaign conducted in France. They consist of images of a man having sex with a giant, black scorpion, and a woman receiving oral sex from an enormous, hairy tarantula, and once again, although they get the point across, we’re not sure if psychologically we’re any better off for it.

1. Plane Stupid – Polar Bears Falling From the Sky


This sickening ad admonishing us to think twice before booking flights works around the idea that ‘your flight has an impact’. It takes this idea to extremes when it features polar bears falling out of the sky and impacting on hard tarmac, before panning out to show them lying bloodied and broken. Climate change is bad, yes we get the picture, but is the reality really so direct and if it is, do we really need to see it like this? And should our kids see it?

Did you like this post? Leave your comments below!
Found this Post interesting? Receive new posts via RSS (What is RSS?) or Subscribe to CR by Email

[+/-] EXPAND TO READ FULL POST...


25 Extreme Examples of Laziness [Pics]

Look, pictures. [via holytaco]

Did you like this post? Leave your comments below!
Found this Post interesting? Receive new posts via RSS (What is RSS?) or Subscribe to CR by Email

[+/-] EXPAND TO READ FULL POST...


2009-12-09

12 'Sexy' Ads That Will Give You Nightmares

Sex sells, but that doesn't mean that selling things using sex is easy. You figure a little cleavage can go a long way to sell cars or beer, but in the wrong hands a sexy ad can turn into the stuff nightmares are made of. [via cracked]

Not even sexy nightmares, either.

#12. Baby Soft's Sexy Toddler

It really is hard to work pedophilia into your ad campaign gracefully. In the 70s, this Love's Baby Soft ad, with a dolled-up, pouty-lipped child and the slogan "because innocence is sexier than you think" appeared in an issue of Tiger Beat magazine.

And really, what better place to convince both young girls and sexual predators that this product can turn a preteen into a sexual dynamo?

We can't figure out whether this ad means the 70s were a much more innocent time (when, what, nobody had heard of pedophiles?) or a much, much sleazier time. From our brief research into the 70s, we're going to go with the latter.

Fortunately, we've come a long way since then...

#11. Anti-Pedophile Awareness

... or, maybe not.

The Child and Adolescent Reference Center, perhaps worried about the army of pedophiles that Love's Baby Soft ad recruited, figured they needed to raise awareness about the problem. But how? Public service ads are so easy to ignore, and it's crucial that the public understand the horror of this issue.

Hey! Why not diagram a child blowing a dude?

The end result is a bizarre image of an invisible pedophile who's apparently only visible when viewed through some special infrared camera. Parents, your child could be getting teabagged by an invisible pedo right now.

And if the overwhelming awfulness going on in this ad isn't enough, there seems to be an ugly "how-to" vibe at work as well. How many pedophiles saw this and thought, "Rolling chair? Toy truck? Brilliant!"

We shudder to think.

#10. Dolce and Gabbana Rape

If you're not familiar with the Dolce and Gabbana, you've likely seen the clothes if you've run into a douchebag recently. Apparently eager to distance themselves from the douche demographic, the fine folks at the D and G marketing department decided to aim for those fashionable, gay, gang-rape clubs you're always hearing about.

We could spend the rest of this article detailing all of the untold stories in the above photo. Is the naked victim dead, or just knocked out by heavy tranquilizers? The man zipping his pants, did he just finish, or is it his turn? The man on the right, listening intently... is he so new to the world of rape that he must take detailed instructions from his gray-haired rape coach on the far right?

#9. Burger King

Like any good restaurant, Burger King is well aware that people love blowjobs. But most ad campaigns that find success by incorporating fellatio into their sales message do so by implying that if you buy their product, you will be on the receiving end of copious amounts of oral sex mere moments later. Burger King, on the other hand, apparently thinks it would work better for everyone if you were to just blow them instead.

According to the ad for their new Big Seven Incher, one of the most atrociously named food products since the McSodomy with Cheese, it will "blow your mind away." Is that what the expression the woman's face is supposed to mean? It kind of looks like she's trying to cope with the revelation that the Burger King mascot has a greasy sandwich for a dong.

#8. Durex Condoms

Hey, we bet you thought that was going to be the most horrifying oral sex reference on the list. You were wrong, weren't you? Weren't you?

The major selling point for this ad, other than the fact it's for a 9.5-inch long condom, is that you can finally rest easy when you're giving some mostly faceless lady a Joker smile, because you're going to be covered and it's pretty obvious she's going to be bleeding.

You could call this ad "inappropriate" in the sense that it seems intended for someone with a 15-year-old boy's concept of sex. But actually it's perfectly appropriate for the Durex XXL customer: the guy who thinks his cock is so huge that no normal condom can cover it. Dude, you can fit a regular condom over your head. Even if you did have a freakish dick wide enough to rip open a jaw (say, three-inches in diameter), this product still only has one legitimate use: to impress the cashier at the drug store when you're checking out.

#7. Playstation Body Hair Pillows

Aaaaand with one image we have been turned off of both sex and video games forever.

This has to be based off a dream somebody at Sony had. Or maybe it's the result of a hilarious mistranslation from the corporate office in Japan and the ad design team in the USA. Either way, this woman is about to get caught fucking four giant, hairy, flesh buttons.

There are so many horrible little details here: From the way the living cushions have no human features other than sweat, chest hair and pleasure trails, to the way the cushion on the far right is writhing, like a huge fucking tongue.

Also, if you look on the end of the bed there, it appears one of them came in wearing a fur coat. Have fun with that mental image for a while.

#6. Read Deutsch Magazine, Here is Some Beastiality

Apparently the ad department at this German magazine couldn't think of anything else that accurately encapsulated what their periodical has to offer the public more than a woman getting oral from a dog. We've all been backed into that corner before.

The series of ads feature nothing more than the word "Deutsch" and then in smaller text the assurance that it's a magazine for international lifestyles. Really, Deutsch? That's how they do it overseas? What country are you talking about exactly?

Maybe this is an attempt at an image makeover, like Dolce and Gabbana, and it all started with them figuring out how they as Germans could put those unpleasant Nazi associations behind them. So really it was this or pedophilia, and that one was already taken.

#5. Patrick Cox Shoes: Ideal for Jockstrap Wrestling

Coming from the UK, this ad for Patrick Cox shoes demonstrates what happens when ad people realize that shoes are fucking boring and that angry, Greco-Roman man sex will at least draw some extra attention to those boring ass shoes.

On first glance you might think "but those dudes aren't even wearing shoes" and you'd be right, but there does appear to be a female spectator in shoes, watching as one jock-strap wearing greasy man pile drives another jock-strap wearing dude's corn hole on a hardwood floor. See, it's not the official shoe of man rape, it's the official shoe of watching man rape.

The company was disappointed to see their ad banned and responded by pointing out that, since both men have jock straps on, technically no penetrative sex can take place. Thank God for that, otherwise this perplexing gymnasium pseudo rape scene might be weird.

#4. S&M Vacuums

Back to Germany again, where if you can't make someone feel awkward with your ad campaign then you're just doing it wrong. As you can see, this ad clearly exemplifies why this particular brand of vacuum will suit the needs of any home owner, so long as that home owner only needs a vacuum for the purposes of tying up nude intruders and debasing them in front of a mirror.

You know what's really sad about this scenario (OK, other than the dude's thong and knee boots)? That rug looks filthy.

#3. Toilet Paper Sex

Some products are inherently sexy. The nipple tassel market can't help but be ensconced in sexiness all the time. Lingerie, stripper poles, bananas, all these things carry with them an air of attraction and hotness. And then, on the other end of the spectrum, are products that were specifically designed to clean dirty assholes. Aside from a few "special" people, no one finds these things sexy.

Despite this, the people who make Renova toilet paper thought that ass wiping was a good basis for a sexy ad, the woman looking desperate for access to her man's exceptionally clean anus. Also, their bathroom is a warehouse.

#2. AIDS Awareness: Under the Sea (of Penis)

The ad portrays the worst fishing spot in the known world, somewhere in the Dick Ocean, while a naked Disney Princess guides her condom sub through what is undoubtedly the most obscene coral reef in the history of ever. There are dick turtles, dick octopi, dick jellyfish and even a nasty dick anemone that appears to be splooging in the bottom center.

Worst of all? The artist didn't Google "how does a condom work" before putting brush to paper. You don't put the woman in there, silly. That won't even work, unless you're using Durex XXLs.

The message we're left with? Ladies, do not go scuba diving nude or the entire ocean will try to give you syphilis.

#1. Fucking Hitler

We made a joke up there about Germany and Nazis and we're starting to feel bad about it. After all, the Germans are known for much more than Hitler and sexual perversion. Right?

On an unrelated note, here's a German AIDS public service ad featuring Hitler railing some broad from behind. Everybody involved seems to be enjoying themselves, so we're not completely sure who is supposed to be frightened by this. Really, the only message is that you should always knock before barging into Hitler's room.

The idea behind the campaign was to liken AIDS to some of history's more infamous mass murderers, including Stalin and Saddam Hussein, all of whom are pictured mid coitus with models who we can only assume did not inform friends and family of this particular job.

Did you like this post? Leave your comments below!
Found this Post interesting? Receive new posts via RSS (What is RSS?) or Subscribe to CR by Email

[+/-] EXPAND TO READ FULL POST...


Can My iPod Make This Airplane Explode?

Listening to an iPod or reading a Kindle during takeoff isn't dangerous. It's time the airlines stopped pretending that it is. [via gozmodo]

For years we've been told that gadgets produce EMI—electromagnetic interference—that cause glitches in an aircraft's avionics. A cellphone could interrupt communication between pilots and the tower for a crucial second, or a child's Game Boy could cause a light on a flight computer to go on the fritz.

We can't take excess liquids on a plane on only the slimmest evidence of any real threat. If gadgets were such a threat to safety, they'd be banned entirely.

Instead, an arbitrary set of rules established by the FAA and extended by the airlines prohibits iPods during takeoff, but explicitly allow electric shavers to be used during flight.

Hundreds of travelers at this very moment are using electronic gadgets during takeoff after the flight attendants have taken their jump seats. We're told it's dangerous. It isn't. Let's drop the pretense.*

The EMI Lie

In 1993, the International Association of Transport Aircraft (IATA) suggested that airlines prohibit the use of personal electronic devices during takeoff and landing, despite a lack of evidence that these gadgets had caused a single accident. The IATA's Terry Denny then said, "We haven't been able to trace an accident to the use of one of these devices...but we are convinced that this could happen."

In the intervening decades, gadgets became something more than a toy for the rich or nerdy, but an intrinsic sidekick for nearly everyone. Especially the iPod.

In 2006, the Federal Aviation Administration commissioned a study to see if "intentionally transmitting" gadgets like cellphones and Wi-Fi caused interference with avionics. The final report "said there is insufficient information to support a wholesale change in policies that restrict use of PEDs." ("PEDs" is FAA-speak for a gadget, or "Personal Electronic Device(s)"; a PED with a radio transmitter is a "T-PED".)

Which is to say, they couldn't find a reason to change their policy—but there hadn't been a whole lot of evidence to begin with.

Yet the FAA has approved in-flight Wi-Fi service for a variety of airlines. While the routers and systems must undergo an FAA certification, there's nothing magical about the onboard 2.4GHz signal broadcast that prevents it from interfering with the plane's avionics. The thousands of flights completed safely each day—a marvelous and commendable record, it should be noted—clearly indicate that having activated gadgets on board aircraft does nothing of negative consequence.

So your laptop's Wi-Fi won't mess up the planes avionics, but your Kindle might? How fragile are these planes?

"But it's about paying attention"

I've had conversations with pilots and other employees of airlines about this issue before, and after they realize the electromagnetic interference argument isn't going to fly, they invariably change tack to "safety". "Takeoff and landing are the most dangerous parts of the flight," they say. "And it's important that passengers be able to hear instructions from the crew in case something goes wrong."

That's a nice idea, but look around the cabin of an embarking aircraft. Parents are soothing cranky kids. People are asleep. Many passengers are drunk or medicated to help address anxiety.

If there were an accident, alerting an unaware person with headphones would take no more effort than nudging a sleeping person next to you. It's not prohibited to sleep during takeoff, just as it isn't prohibited to read a book or magazine or to be deaf. (This also presumes that a passenger could do anything to protect themselves or others during a takeoff accident, even though we all know that in a majority of incidents, there's little to do except pray.)

Ah, but what about gadgets flying around the cabin as missiles if there is turbulence? It could happen, sure, but is a Kindle appreciably more dangerous than a hardcover book? If a Nintendo DS could hurt someone during an unexpected loss of altitude, why are they ever allowed to be unstowed? The answer is simply that the likelihood of these things happening is far less than the likelihood that customers will go absolutely apoplectic if they aren't allowed some sort of inflight entertainment.

If the airlines are already able to make a judgement between ultimate safety and convenience, why not loosen up just a little more?

Little things matter

I have a lot of sympathy for flight attendants. Herding and soothing a few dozen passengers, many of whom are belligerent and rude, is a thankless job. Their jobs should be easier. They're the ones who have to explain to passengers why the pilots were too busy playing with their laptops to land the plane.

But every time a flight attendant perpetuates the lie that these harmless gadgets are somehow a threat to safety, it erodes the faith that they should be cultivating with their customers. How are we to trust someone telling us that reading a Kindle during takeoff is dangerous as we stare across a field of EMI-spewing LCD seat-back screens?

Here's a deal: I'll listen attentively to the flight safety demonstration, make doubly sure to note where the exit doors are and who I'll have to climb over to get to them—and you guys will let me listen to my iPod after the flight attendants are in their seats and I'm making peace with my god.

Trust me, I'll be a lot more apt to listen to flight attendants commands if they don't start the flight with a well-intentioned deception. And more likely to believe the FAA and the TSA when it comes to other security and safety concerns when some of their policies aren't demonstrable half-truths.

* I'm not talking about using Wi-Fi or cellphones during takeoff. I'm in complete support of "Airplane Mode" during takeoff, if not the entire flight. What anecdotal evidence there is about EMI from gadgets is almost exclusively suspected to be from radios and other transmitters.

Did you like this post? Leave your comments below!
Found this Post interesting? Receive new posts via RSS (What is RSS?) or Subscribe to CR by Email

[+/-] EXPAND TO READ FULL POST...


The Past Week's Articles on Curious Read